I think about Chris, the Chris in my office, all the time. We've been friends on and off for a year or two, and he literally fascinates me. I think he's about 27 or 28. He was a radio producer and then came to work in the City to make more money. Now he produces music in his spare time and socialises. He owns a fast car, some sort of Mazda I think. It's black and, I believe, capable of 180 mph. Or maybe it can go faster than that, but that's as fast as he's gone in it. I don't know. It makes him happy. And this is the thing. Chris knows exactly what makes him happy, and, vitally, those things are attainable for him. He likes: his friend group (already attained), getting drunk on Thursdays, Fridays and Saturdays (easily done), girls (never has any problems), going to Glastonbury (easy), and his car (attained). He has struggles, of course. His dad nearly died last year, which shook up Chris a lot, but now he starts every day being grateful that he can even stand up without assistance, and he spends the remaining hours counting down to the next time he can go out with his friends and get drunk. He never seems to get bored of the pattern, never seems to want more than he has, or certainly not more than is achievable for him. He wants his own life.
I want his life too. My head is nothing like Chris'. His head is so simple, with a few clear functions and no clutter, like an airport departure lounge. I am embroiled in an existential crisis and my head is a frenzy, no clear ideas about what is happening, where it's going, or faith that it can achieve what it should, like a squat. I need some sort of interior head designer to turn my squat into a departure lounge. I want to live in The Terminal, but with a better script.
I believe there is no overarching meaning to life, and that everything ends when we die: there is no afterlife, there is no reincarnation, there are no souls. All humans need a sense of purpose to function, so we set ourselves goal after goal, until we die. I believe that death is life's vital ingredient, the border that gives the garden definition (you'll like that, TB). I do not fear it, but I don't want it to happen just yet. I believe that life is a gift, and, like anyone else, ideally I'd enjoy what's left of it.
To be at peace, I think humans need a purpose. I want to enjoy myself, but that is impossible without peace. I believe that helping others or spending one's working hours doing something rewarding, providing a service that benefits others, is a good way to feel purposeful. My boss needs me, but I do not feel stretched. However, I struggle to think of a job that would suit my needs better - certainly any job that I could get would involve taking a fairly big pay cut, which is a scary prospect with a large mortgage in these times of economic uncertainty. And besides, I don't want my job to define me. I don't think jobs are that important. So I stay where I am and focus on the positives.
And yet I am lonely. My friends cannot give me the attention I crave. I want all-encompassing love and recognition from a higher place. I am such a perfect candidate for evangelical Christianity it is gobsmacking that I manage to remain such a devout atheist. But my persistence in searching for the next goal, the next person to convert, is tragic. I am not enough. I must always be proving myself. It is exhausting and fruitless, and yet, to stop would be terrifying. To say, "Here is good. Right now. This is what I want." The thought makes me want to cry. It feels like failing, which is ironic since believing that now is alright would be to have found peace at last.
And yet, not so long ago, I thought I had it. At the beginning of this year, I felt amazing. I had accepted that this was all there is, and I had (I believed) come to terms with it. I felt free and ecstatic. Yet now, five or so weeks later, I'm battling with it all again. So what changed? I'll tell you what happened: I was rejected and it wobbled me. The boyban is still intact (apart from one 20 min incident that we'll gloss over), but there was a frisson with someone, and then it turned out to be nothing more than that. And I crashed.
I talked about it a lot in therapy. Why do I keep going for guys who reject me? Why do I always criticise the boys who love me? And eventually, last week, I said it: I cannot respect anyone who doesn't reject me.
My therapist repeated it back to me, slowly. (This is what I pay her to do). You cannot respect anyone who doesn't reject you, she said. I thought about it, and nodded.
And, of course, this makes it impossible for me to love anyone who doesn't treat me like shit at least some of the time. Faithful, this was not a happy realisation. I felt left out as a child, and so now I don't feel comfortable unless I'm still being excluded, unless I still have to jump through hoops to get someone's attention. If you give me all your attention, you're obviously a loser and not worthy of my time or respect.
So I idolise people who go hot and cold on me, and I fancy boys who can't commit. It all makes sense. But it sure as hell doesn't paint my future in a rosy light. How the heck do I stop doing this? How do I start fancying the good guys, the ones who will love me outright? How do I hear them say, "I love you," and not automatically think, "Well, then you are clearly a moron. Please leave."? I suppose just being aware of this propensity is a good start. And, let's face it, I am so far from being able to break the boyban that it really isn't a problem right now. But the fact is: I am a bit of a mess. I have no clear purpose in life, love is all I want, yet loving someone who loves me seems like a dialectical impossibility. I feel like a really thick dog chasing its tail. HOORAY!
In happier news, I am looking thin and two people this year have thought I was IN MY MID-TWENTIES. That is brilliant. Totally superficial, but brilliant.
Dear Jane,
ReplyDeleteThank you for allowing me to peek inside your head.
The recognition that you cannot respect anyone who doesn't reject you is a big step forward. It certainly appears to have resonated deeply with you.
However, I would like to suggest that there is a second possible interpretation of the reasons for your behavior.
It appears that you put it down to a sort of conditioned response which you learned in childhood. You say:
'I felt left out as a child, and so now I don't feel comfortable unless I'm still being excluded, unless I still have to jump through hoops to get someone's attention.'
However, I see the problem not so much in terms of the repetition of childhood behavior, but rather in terms of the fact that your childhood experience contributed to a lack of self-confidence which now manifests itself as an absence of a sense of self-worth. At the risk of sounding rather American, I think you have to be able to love yourself to a certain degree before you can love someone else, and before you can allow someone else to love you.
When you do meet someone who could love you, then maybe this is what you are subconsciously doing:
'Uh oh, here is someone who might love me. But I am unloveable. Therefore, if this person loves me, he must be an idiot and a loser. Ergo, I don't want to have anything to do with him.'
From reading your blog, it does seem that your sense of self-worth fluctuates. Most of the time it's pretty good, as it should be. So maybe it's just the residue of those childhood experiences that occasionally drags you back down.
Love, like charity, begins at home. Once you recognise how loveable you are, then you will cease to reject people for the wrong reasons.
Forgive me for writing so intrusively. I just don't want you to fail to resolve this through not considering all possible interpretations. I may have got this completely wrong, and in that case I apologise unreservedly.
Hi Anon, and thank you for such a carefully-thought-out comment. I'm flattered that you'd spend so much time writing to a stranger.
ReplyDeleteI'm not sure how long you've been reading LLFF but I have definitely written in the past (at length!) that my lack of a sense of self-worth was the reason for my depression, and my inability to find a happy loving relationship.
That has always been my explanation - that I don't love myself and so can't respect anyone else who loves me.
This hoop-jumping rant is really just an add-on to that - not a replacement or contradition of the original theory, but an addition to it, to explain why I LOVE people who are hot and cold with me.
What you seem to be saying is that it's not me repeating childhood patterns when I find it difficult to respect someone who loves me, but rather that my lack of self-worth renders me unable to believe they can possibly love me.
I think the two are so connected as to be virtually indistinguishable. Either way, they have the same outcome - and the cure (learning self-respect) is the same.
Overall, I don't really think it's the kind of situation where everything suddenly clicks into place - it's more a gradual evolution, where one day you realise you're feeling a lot better, and you look back to see when it started, and you can't remember. But I'm glad to have your input and hope your psychological meadow is full of beautiful flowers.
Thank you for not being dismissive: I did go back and look through some of your earlier posts, and realised that my comments were rather redundant.
ReplyDeleteAnd yes, both interpretations are very closely linked. However, I didn't want to suggest that low self-esteem stops you from believing that someone loves you. Rather, that you think they are losers if they do.
But yes, self-esteem/ self-respect is crucial whatever the etiology.
I am also interested by your musings on changing job/life, though you always come up against your mortgage/ that jobs are hard to get/ your life is outwardly great etc.
Have you ever come across Sartre's view that humans are 'condemned to be free', and yet we spend our lives running from that frightening truth? He gives the example of a Parisian waiter - a man who happens to be a waiter, and convinces himself that the role defines him. He sweeps a little too fastidiously and serves a little to eagerly; he is playing a role. Why? Because he has to convince himself that there are no alternate possibilities, that he has no free choice. But, says Sartre, he is deceiving himself and being 'inauthentic'; we are condemned to be free.
If he really wanted to, he could walk out of the cafe that moment, leave his wife, take a ship to Tahiti. Gaugin did.
What is the price of deceiving oneself about one's freedom? That surely depends on the individual.
Anyway, I know that's all very extreme, and I'm not suggesting you buy a one way ticket to Tahiti, but I do think it's an interesting idea. We don't tend to think about authenticity very much.
Sartre is a genius, there's no denying it - I studied him a bit at uni. I absolutely believe/agree that humans put rigid structures around themselves because the alternative is too horrific to contemplate, and (as my ostrich-head-in-the-sand post was meant to illustrate) I think it's a case of joining them rather than beating them on this one.
ReplyDeleteI don't think Tahiti would be the solution, I'd be bored stiff in a minute. I'd be bored after a few weeks of doing most things, to be honest. Which brings me back to my favourite stock Buddhist mantra, 'Wherever I go, there I am.'